Everything in
creation is dependent on method. The
ideological method posits we are ideas who
walk on two legs and enter the department flashing footnotes on our
foreheads. We enter a conversation whose limits have already been
fixed and whose lexicon requires constant use, like a dog her walks.
Another method argues that we hire persons, not ideas, that they are
not, of necessity, the same thing, that we enter a conversation whose
limits resemble an octopus's body. Shape shifting is possible,
but
more dangerous to the group with power. Some words go both ways, like
“terror”
or “authority,” until you can't read them at
all. Who
can tell the performer from the play? This improvisation is such a
clusterfuck, hopping
tweet to tweet like a unicyclist between boulders. Some words are
better than others because they walk on two feet and
always mean what we say. We
knew the man on the unicycle was talking about art, even if he did
not. Something about it made us all laugh, save one.
--15 January 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment