In the silence of eucalyptus: Valentina Meloni reads Susan M. Schultz

“Me and Eucalyptus” by Susan M. Schultz: the metaphysical relationship between man and nature in nature writing

There are books about trees that teach to recognize species, others that tell the forests as places of salvation, still others that transform the landscape into autobiography. Me and Eucalyptus by Susan M. Schultz belongs to a rarer category: that of books seeking a relationship.

In the great tradition of nature writing — from Henry David Thoreau to Roger Deakin, to the most recent books dedicated to trees as living, symbolic, almost interlocutory creatures — Schultz chooses a very personal path. He doesn't cross woods, he doesn't build a botanical atlas, he doesn't tell nature as a refuge. He remains next to a single tree. A eucalyptus observed day after day, photographed, interrogated, heard.

From this fidelity comes a surprising, hybrid and luminous book, which continuously oscillates between poetry, meditation, diary and philosophical reflection.

Artistic close-up of the textured bark of a eucalyptus tree with shades of color

The author looks at the tree as you look at a living being capable of presence. Not an object of the landscape, but something that exists next to her, in the mystery of an impossible yet real reciprocity:

“Eucalyptus and I cannot communicate, even if we are in communion.”

Perhaps this is the phrase that best guards the heart of the book. Schultz knows that the tree will never speak the human language, and yet he continues to turn to him. He observes the bark, the resin, the colors, the wounds. He photographs it obsessively, as if each image could bring it closer to something essential.

And the images, in these pages, count as much as the words. Photography is not just documentation: it is a way of being in the world, of measuring the distance between what we see and what really exists.

“Focus is presence.”

But the presence never coincides with possession. Schultz understands it continuously: every attempt to capture the tree risks turning it into an image, into an “object”, into something separate. For this reason, the book dialogues underground with the thought of Martin Buber and his distinction between “I-You” and “I-It”. The eucalyptus always remains on the border: a real creature and at the same time irreducible, near and far.

The writing proceeds by lightning, fragments, intuitions. Schultz naturally passes from personal memory to philosophy, from the contemplation of the tree to the violence of the contemporary present. In the book enter the war, the media images, the technology, the chatbots, the digital photography, the incessant noise of the modern world. Yet the eucalyptus remains there, motionless, almost to guard another temporality.

Artistic close-up of the textured bark of a eucalyptus tree with shades of color

Some passages reach an extraordinary poetic intensity:

“Your silences don’t bother me. They protect me.”

or:

“The tree is broken (however it stands.”

In these sentences you can feel something that goes beyond ecological discourse. The tree becomes a figure of human vulnerability, of resistance, of memory that continues to live despite the wounds.

Yet Eucalyptus and I never indulge in easy sentimentality. Schultz does not idealize nature and does not transform it into consolation. He knows that every look is partial, that even photography can lie:

“To see is already to interpret, and to interpret is inevitably to lie.”

It is precisely this awareness that makes the book so contemporary. The author does not seek absolute truths: she seeks a form of attention. A chance to stay by the way without dominating them.

As in Roger Deakin's most beautiful books, here too the landscape becomes an inner experience; but Schultz is more fragmentary, more philosophical, more restless. Where Deakin recounted the cultural relationship between man and nature, Schultz stages an almost metaphysical relationship, made of silences, images and unanswered questions.

At the end of the book there remains the feeling of having inhabited a space of rare contemplation in contemporary literature. A place where a single tree still manages to oppose the speed of the world, forcing us to look better.