Our
scripture for today comes from T.S. Eliot’s “Tradition and the
Individual Talent,” 1919.
"Tradition
is a matter of much wider significance. It cannot be inherited, and
if you want it you must obtain it by great labour. It involves, in
the first place, the historical sense . . . and the historical sense
involves a perception, not only of the pastness of the past, but of
its presence; the historical sense compels a man to write not merely
with his own generation in his bones, but with a feeling that the
whole of the literature of Europe from Homer and within it the whole
of the literature of his own country has a simultaneous existence and
composes a simultaneous order."
******
And later in the essay:
"There
remains to define this process of depersonalization and its relation
to the sense of tradition. It is in this depersonalization that art
may be said to approach the condition of science. I, therefore,
invite you to consider, as a suggestive analogy, the action which
takes place when a bit of finely filiated platinum is introduced into
a chamber containing oxygen and sulphur dioxide."
This
quotation is significant, both because Jon Morse began his career as
a scientist, and because he went to school to become a Modernist and
scholar of T.S. Eliot (and everything else). He worked for Eli Lilly
from 1964 to 1973 (as a microbiologist), and returned to school
to get a degree in English from Indiana University. He taught at
Wayne State from 1973-1977, and then came to Hawai’i. And the rest,
as they say, is now history. History, I might add, its operation
in language and by way of image, has been his primary obsession as a
writer and professor.
Jon
Morse came to my house years ago to deliver a book or some
photographs. He got down on the living room floor and took a
photograph of our cat, Tortilla. Tortor was part of a tradition; he
had been Gaye Chan’s cat for 10 years, before he became ours. The
photograph of him by Jon became a painting by my mother-in-law, Anne
Waters. When I look at Tor’s painting, I think of layers of history
that include Jon as an important catalyst. He was the finely filiated
platinum, the catalyst, for this feline memory.
Jon
proved a catalyst for many of his students, as well as becoming a
vital part of their histories. One student we shared long ago, Louis
Bliemeister, brought me a bowl he’d made to represent “The Love
Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.” He later renovated both our bathrooms
(there ARE jobs for English majors!), and wrote this to me today
apropos of Jon’s influence: “his passion for everything written,
from Gilgamesh to Pinter, helped instill a lifelong passion for words
in me."
For
the past many years, Jon has maintained a blog called The
Art Part,
on which he writes about old photographs, history, art, and on which
he puts pictures of his cats, with titles like . . . "Victorian
prosody: the Laureate discovers a rhyme for 'crannies'”--the photographis of a cat that resembles Tortor, his face pressed
against a cracked cement wall.
This
blog continues his long engagement with literature and history. I
returned to his 1990 Cornell UP book, Word by Word: The Language
of Memory, this past week. I suppose the book was sold as
“literary criticism,” but it strikes me as more a meditation on
language and history by way of literature. It’s a very smart book,
sure, but it’s also a wise one.
At
both the beginning and the end of this remarkable book—whose range
of references is stunning—Jon quotes Wallace Stevens’s poem, “The
Idea of Order at Key West,” the one whose central figure is a woman
walking beside the sea, ordering the world in her song. In the
introduction he writes this paragraph, which I will use as a farewell
into a happy and productive future for Jon:
“To
enchant is to cast a spell over by means of song. A song is a sound
that can come to its measured end. Now that we know it is over, we
can sing it in the past tense, as history. We make history of
ourselves, word by word. And as that history passes through us on its
way to the past tense, we shape ourselves around its words. And that
is why readers continue to read the life of Emily Dickinson. They
know their history. They know that history can tell us only one
thing, but that one thing is enough. History tells us this: At the
end of the story, we can begin to mean.”
Welcome
to meaning’s onset, Jon Morse!
1 comment:
Thanks enormously!
Jon
Post a Comment