Part two is about part one of the sequence, which is only just.
https://rh4075.substack.com/p/part-2-interview-with-author-susan
Please support Richard's substack, if you go there. It's well worth the visit.
Drafts of prose poems about memory and forgetting.
Part two is about part one of the sequence, which is only just.
https://rh4075.substack.com/p/part-2-interview-with-author-susan
Please support Richard's substack, if you go there. It's well worth the visit.
I happen to love the backpacking book, its instructions on "how to walk," and the prints by Albert's brother, Gompers. Highly recommended.
Albert's old cottage in Volcano is for sale for an incredibly high price! We have such fond memories of spending time with him there before he died in 2011. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/19-3994-Kalani-Honua-Loop_Volcano_HI_96785_M94276-67411?from=srp_next
Recently, Richard Hamilton and I had a long discussion of my book, "She's Welcome to Her Disease": Dementia Blog, Volume 2 from Singing Horse Press. Richard has put the conversation on his substack, which is worth visiting in any case.
The second volume of DB kind of disappeared into the ether, so it's good to see that it's getting notice now. It's the most formally inventive of my books, using bureaucratic forms, photographs, inventories, children's stories and other materials to tell the story of my mother's last years. It's also a portrait of an Alzheimer's community, one in which people have long conversations, fall in love, fall down, and experience emotions. I miss them.
https://rh4075.substack.com/p/revisiting-shes-welcome-to-her-disease
The covers for both volumes were thoughtfully designed by Gaye Chan.
Here is the essay in Italian: https://www.rivista-diwali.art/io-ed-eucalipto-susan-schultz-recensione/
There's a translation function that pops up, which seems good enough, though it keeps referring to me as "he," which is disconcerting.
And here is something about the essayist, https://thepunchmagazine.com/author/valentina-meloni
And here is the essay in English. Google doesn't do pronouns, apparently.
12 June 2026 Valentina Meloni InEvidence, InNews, InVerso, InVerso (poetry) 0
There are books about trees that teach to recognize species, others that tell the forests as places of salvation, still others that transform the landscape into autobiography. Me and Eucalyptus by Susan M. Schultz belongs to a rarer category: that of books seeking a relationship.
In the great tradition of nature writing — from Henry David Thoreau to Roger Deakin, to the most recent books dedicated to trees as living, symbolic, almost interlocutory creatures — Schultz chooses a very personal path. He doesn't cross woods, he doesn't build a botanical atlas, he doesn't tell nature as a refuge. He remains next to a single tree. A eucalyptus observed day after day, photographed, interrogated, heard.
From this fidelity comes a surprising, hybrid and luminous book, which continuously oscillates between poetry, meditation, diary and philosophical reflection.

The author looks at the tree as you look at a living being capable of presence. Not an object of the landscape, but something that exists next to her, in the mystery of an impossible yet real reciprocity:
“Eucalyptus and I cannot communicate, even if we are in communion.”
Perhaps this is the phrase that best guards the heart of the book. Schultz knows that the tree will never speak the human language, and yet he continues to turn to him. He observes the bark, the resin, the colors, the wounds. He photographs it obsessively, as if each image could bring it closer to something essential.
And the images, in these pages, count as much as the words. Photography is not just documentation: it is a way of being in the world, of measuring the distance between what we see and what really exists.
“Focus is presence.”
But the presence never coincides with possession. Schultz understands it continuously: every attempt to capture the tree risks turning it into an image, into an “object”, into something separate. For this reason, the book dialogues underground with the thought of Martin Buber and his distinction between “I-You” and “I-It”. The eucalyptus always remains on the border: a real creature and at the same time irreducible, near and far.
The writing proceeds by lightning, fragments, intuitions. Schultz naturally passes from personal memory to philosophy, from the contemplation of the tree to the violence of the contemporary present. In the book enter the war, the media images, the technology, the chatbots, the digital photography, the incessant noise of the modern world. Yet the eucalyptus remains there, motionless, almost to guard another temporality.

Some passages reach an extraordinary poetic intensity:
“Your silences don’t bother me. They protect me.”
or:
“The tree is broken (however it stands.”
In these sentences you can feel something that goes beyond ecological discourse. The tree becomes a figure of human vulnerability, of resistance, of memory that continues to live despite the wounds.
Yet Eucalyptus and I never indulge in easy sentimentality. Schultz does not idealize nature and does not transform it into consolation. He knows that every look is partial, that even photography can lie:
“To see is already to interpret, and to interpret is inevitably to lie.”
It is precisely this awareness that makes the book so contemporary. The author does not seek absolute truths: she seeks a form of attention. A chance to stay by the way without dominating them.
As in Roger Deakin's most beautiful books, here too the landscape becomes an inner experience; but Schultz is more fragmentary, more philosophical, more restless. Where Deakin recounted the cultural relationship between man and nature, Schultz stages an almost metaphysical relationship, made of silences, images and unanswered questions.
At the end of the book there remains the feeling of having inhabited a space of rare contemplation in contemporary literature. A place where a single tree still manages to oppose the speed of the world, forcing us to look better.
And maybe that's what Susan M gives us. Schultz: not a lesson about nature, but an exercise in presence.
I just splurged on a three volume set of Weil's Cahiers off ebay. I wrote a short book about ten years ago, based on quotations from her notebooks (a translation of which I found in our university library). I'm also watching Benjamin Braude's lecture on the ways that her editors misrepresented her work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnaAQRIJm_M
And I found this generous selection of my Weil work at seedings, from Jerrold Shiroma's (late) on-line journal through Duration Press. (He also published a generous selection from Caroline Sinavaiana's mother elegies, which I go to quite often these days.) You can read her work here: https://durationpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/seedings-7_c-sinavaiana-gabbard.pdf
So here are some of my Simone Weil memory cards: https://durationpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/seedings-2_s-m-schultz.pdf
The book was published by Rod Mengham's Equipage Press in the UK. https://equipagepress.weebly.com/
Attention--not self-promotion--is a form of prayer. But herewith a promotional prayer . . .
My newest book, WAR DIARY, has no blurbs on or in it, but I've gotten some lovely responses from writer-friends. Spuyten Duyvil has put their remarks up on the website, here: https://spuytenduyvil.net/War-Diary.html
It must have been those dementia classes I took from my mother that made me re-read The Memory Police, though there was little re- to it, as I can’t remember plots. I recalled the concept (authoritarian state demands forgetting on an uncertain schedule): characters are startled by disappearances. Birds, libraries, novels, you name it until you can’t. The plot lines: a novelist who writes about a typist whose voice was stolen by her instructor, who imprisons her in a room full of dead machines; a journalist hidden under the floorboards of the novelist’s house; an old man who lives in a half-sunken ferry; a dog. Novels require furniture, but that’s what I forget.
I did remember the box of things forgotten, hidden away by the novelist’s mother. I did remember that some characters still remember what everyone else has forgotten. They’re on the run from the Memory Police, who seem to remember what they’re mandated to make others forget. Everyone lives on an island, the better to symbolize their isolation. The ferry boat finally sinks, and the old man joins the novelist and her journalist friend in the house with the dog.
They’re like worry stones, these objects laid out on a narrow bed. To touch them is not to remember their purpose, but at least to know they existed. The day the birds flew away, I imagine their songs were pulled away like ribbons. Did the birds escape their being forgotten? And do they look under their nests for the old tunes to pull out like worms?
I dreamed I was covered with feathers, like a duck, that I stayed dry under their soft slick umbrella. Now I’m in a small room, as if hidden below the house, typing as it rains. A friend saw rain on the streaming video of Kilauea yesterday, but at least she witnessed the eruption. Afterwards, scarves of steam rose from the lava. Some evenings this is our screen saver, preserved by our distance from the “episode,” ash and tephra raining on black rock.
Plot lines bob and weave, run their patterns toward the basket; score and that chapter ends. Sentences are cords that bind the stories to pallets. Meaning’s the Matson liner that carries them into an introspective space that grows more bare. We might forget it soon, what with the pressures of reality that seem so farcical, or the farce that persuades us it’s real. The space of a small room with two narrow beds, one for each man afflicted by demons.
They love to play chess together, these two. We play medieval music, imagining knights, knowing ourselves to be pawns. The pawn philosopher types and types in her narrow room, feeling less like Wordsworth’s nuns, fretting more at the daily news. One paper would send you to the North Shore for pools of clear water. Another tells you about a mob that nearly killed a teenager and a lifeguard.
Bird songs sound inside the rain dropping on palm fronds behind the brown fence behind our upside down shirts on the laundry line under the eaves. I see no source for any of this, neither rain nor song nor palm tree. What I cannot see is as if forgotten, the lives we didn’t have before we were born. Every newspaper he ever read was the same, he told his son. All the news that’s fit to type.
Note:
In lieu of a review of Yuki Ogawa's The Memory Police.
Startles
A big brown dog on a gurney, the other side of the window, lifts up her head, looks for her person on my side. My gaze is caught, like a vision of reddest cloth the moment after meditation. Not epiphany, which means too much, or story, meaning too little. I have been soaked in words so long, but I find none now, if words mean.
That her face was chiseled, marvelous, was not lost to me. I remarked on its beauty to the man who brought her. He’d been all the way to Waikele, where no one could see her. But this wasn’t aesthetics, not at all. Her face offered me no affect, no interpretation.
The common trigger, like a virus, is exclusion. Someone pulls it, you count it down, then the monkey enters the brain pan, scampering in its cell. The job of monkey mind, the psychologist tells me, is to make you feel alone. So there’s no monkey there, just shadows, echoes. A rope for swinging on.
You’re in the waiting room, your mind on a swing. There’s an earth mover aria on the sound system, calling out squeals and squeaks and groans. The only sense is return. The blur of it. What shutter speed could slow it down?
My husband listened to Moby Dick sped up on his kindle. It was ok, he assured me, because he could hear his own voice through the mechanical patter. A vision of Pip in a vortex comes up. A vet tech came out to lead the man toward the examination room. Lilith and I left for home.