Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Memory notes: death & visitations



Over a week ago I received an email from a poet here in Honolulu--not a submission to Tinfish, he was clear on that--but a set of poems that chronicled the St. Louis Cardinals' 2011 season and World Series win.  He and I sometimes run into each other on campus, each of us sporting a Cardinals cap.  I might be wearing the cap with the bird on it, he a red home cap.  Or he an away blue cap and I the STL logo cap in red.

No sooner had I opened his attachment (that word is ever fraught) than I realized that the first poem marked a visitation.  The poem's title is "The World Series Fell from Heaven," but there was more of heaven to the poem than my poet friend knew.  It begins:

When I watched the Cards lose in DC
in June it was the sort of pure
pain all sports fans learn to endure.
 
His "sort of pure pain" was over a baseball game gone wrong.  "A come-from-ahead-then-fall-behind defeat" describes a game I remember, too. It was this game.  I paste in the line-score.

7:05 PM ET, June 14, 2011
Nationals Park, Washington, D.C.

123456789 R H E
STL 200130000 6 9 2
WSH 00010160- 8 13
W: H. Rodriguez (2-1)
L: M. Batista (3-2)
S: D. Storen (16)

The game started one hour after my mother died; by the time I reached my friends' house in suburban DC and asked that the game be turned on, the Cardinals were well ahead.  Perhaps it was 6-1 or 6-2.  We were making what small talk we could.  And then the Nationals made their come-back, fueled as much by the Cardinals' sorry relief corps as by their own hitting prowess.  My poet friend was sitting next to an obnoxious Nationals' fan--one of those who is not really a baseball fan, but cheers loudly for the home team--and I was performing an odd wake for my mother.  

That evening, I returned to my hotel room and wrote this blog entry.  There is no mention in it of the St. Louis Cardinals.  Instead, I wrote in part about a coincidence that brought me back the voice of my father by way of his old friend, Jerry Lawlor.  Here is the paragraph on that coincidence:

Ellen took me home with her and Steve. They & Max asked about my father. I offered history: Michigan farm, auto plant, air force (when it integrated, he knew Tuskegee airmen), IBM, Western Union. Ellen said, Jerry Lawler. Jerry Lawler! My father's Irish friend, office roommate of Col. Dudley Stevenson, Tuskegee airman. Steve called Jerry; we explained the coincidence. He darted off to find a letter. Please, do you mind? I'm looking. Dear Jerry, the letter read. My father's voice, Irished. Jerry, you never put yourself above others, gave credit to them & did not take it. The experience of an Irish immigrant. Martha & Susan join me in wishing you a long & enjoyable retirement.  

 And here is a photograph of that letter, its wording true:



I've been reading W.G. Sebald's books now that the semester has ended.  In Austerlitz, he writes: "if Newton really thought that time was a river like the Thames, then where is its source and into what sea does it finally flow?  Every river, as we know, must have banks on both sides, so where, seen in those terms, where are the banks of time?  What would be this river's qualities, qualities perhaps corresponding to those of water, which is fluid, rather heavy, and translucent?  In what way do objects immersed in time differ from those left untouched by it?"  Sebald's work is (dis)organized by coincidences, synchronicities.  An ordinary life is never ordinary, hides its memories like a glacier.  One such glacier returns a lost man to the author, but not to the man who had loved him, who had killed himself.  The dead are never dead, always on the cusp of returning.  The living are never out of their sight.  Or all of us exist in a time that is sometimes outside itself, wafting like the dust Sebald found comfort in, not clean like the line of a railroad track.
I have always had at the back of my mind this notion that of course these people aren't really gone, they just hover somewhere at the perimeter of our lives and keep coming in on brief visits. 
It's the nature--super-nature--of these visits that fascinates me in this year since my mother's death.  If I have often lived in within her memories (of The War, of an adventurous life that somehow ended at my birth, becoming ordinary), the post-memories I have of her come of other peoples' lives and memories.  Her death has brought me new friends, Terry Hong of McLean, Virginia, where my mother lived for many years, and Jee Young (Vera) Lee, of Honolulu and Meadville, Pennsylvania, my mother's home town.  Toward the end of her conscious life, my mother confused her memories with mine.  I don't do that, but memories are inevitably a mixed genre, her recollections mine in the context in which I heard them. A car seat. A living room. The kitchen where she chopped vegetables.  Nothing grand.  Just the ordinary events of otherwise unmemorable days, now pushing through time's surface like a fin, or a leaf. 

There is something terribly alluring to me about the past.  I'm hardly interested in the future . . . at least about the past you can have certain illusions.

I want to argue with Sebald over that one.  Future and past are both provinces of the imagination, both susceptible to illusion.  But the passage from his work that strikes me most strongly--is most compelling in its oddity--is this one, again from Austerlitz:

What made me uneasy at the sight of it [the capital of a cast-iron column in Pilsen], however, was not the question whether the complex form of the capital now covered with a puce-tinged encrustation, had really impressed itself on my mind when I passed through Pilsen with the children's transport in the summer of 1939, but the idea, ridiculous in itself, that this cast-iron column, which with its scaly surface seemed almost to approach the nature of a living being, might remember me and was, if I may so put it, said Austerlitz, a witness to what I could no longer recollect for myself.

It's the idea that memories do not live inside of us, but that we live inside the world's memories of our passage, that is so awkwardly telling here.  To have forgotten is odd enough, but to ask that the world remember for us is as beautiful as it is presumptuous. A death leads to a televised game leads to a poem leads to a box score leads back to a father's 1984 letter to a colleague.  The symbolism of loss arrives in numbers on my screen. 


Notes:

The poet is Joseph Stanton, who has written widely about the St. Louis Cardinals.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

memory notes: WG Sebald


Austerlitz

100: If Newton thought, said A, pointing through the window and down to the curve of the water around the Isle of Dogs glistening in the last of the daylight, if Newton really thought that time was a river like the Thames, then where is its source and into what sea does it finally flow?  Every river, as we know, must have banks on both sides, so where, seen in those terms, where are the banks of time?  What would be this river's qualities, qualities perhaps corresponding to those of water, which is fluid, rather heavy, and translucent?  In what way do objects immersed in time differ from those left untouched by it?

101: The dead are outside time, the dying and all the sick at home or in hospitals, and they are not the only ones, for a certain degree of personal misfortune is enough to cut us off from the past and the future.

140: I had constantly been preoccupied by that accumulation of knowledge which I had pursued for decades, and which served as a substitute or compensatory memory.

221: What made me uneasy at the sight of it [the capital of a cast-iron column in Pilsen], however, was not the question whether the complex form of the capital now covered with a puce-tinged encrustation, had really impressed itself on my mind when I passed through Pilsen with the children's transport in the summer of 1939, but the idea, ridiculous in itself, that this cast-iron column, which with hits scaly surface seemed almost to approach the nature of a living being, might remember me and was, if I may so put it, said A, a witness to what I could no longer recollect for myself.


The emergence of memory: Conversations with WG Sebald, ed. Lynne Sharon Schwartz, Seven Stories Press.

Interview with Eleanor Wachtel:

I have always had at the back of my mind this notion that of course these people aren't really gone, they just hover somewhere at the perimeter of our lives and keep coming in on brief visits.

The other function [of using photos in the text] that I see is possibly that of arresting time.  Fiction is an art form that moves in time, that is inclined towards the end, that works on a negative gradient, and it is very, very difficult in that particular form in the narrative to arrest the passage of time.

And the photographs can also do this--they act like barriers or weirs which stem the flow.  I think that is something that is positive, slowing down the speed of reading, as it were.

[Memory] is what qualifies us as emotional creatures . . . And I think there is no way in which we can escape it.  The only thing that you can do, and that most people seem to be able to do very successfully, is to subdue it.  And if you can do that by, I don't know, playing baseball or watching football on television, then that's possibly a good thing, I don't know.

There is something terribly alluring to me about the past.  I'm hardly interested in the future . . . at least about the past you can have certain illusions.

significance of dust

Last Interview with Sebald:

The moral backbone of literature is about that whole question of memory. To my mind it seems clear that those who have no memory have the much greater chance to lead happy lives. But it is something you cannot possibly escape: your psychological make-up is such that you are inclined to look back over your shoulder. Memory, even if you repress it, will come back at you and it will shape your life. Without memories there wouldn't be any writing: the specific weight an image or phrase needs to get across to the reader can only come from things remembered - not from yesterday but from a long time ago.

Tim Denevi sends a couple more Sebald quotes my way: "Memory, he added in a postscript, often strikes me as a kind of dumbness. It makes one’s head heavy and giddy, as if one were not looking back down the receding perspectives of time but rather down on the earth from a great height, from one of those towers whose tops are lost to view in the clouds."

And: "And so they are ever returning to us, the dead. At times they come back from the ice more than seven decades later and are found at the edge of the moraine, a few polished bones and a pair of hobnailed boots."

 

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

New post on jacket2


"He is good, / but he is a product of the world"

Rhetorics of empire in Scott Abels's "Rambo Goes to Idaho"

How to be a poet in Hawai`i--or elsewhere--who opposes imperialism, colonization, the military, and yet appears, as a Euro-American, to embody them? I've worried this issue before on my own blog, and thought I'd think more about it here by way of a new book from BlazeVox by Scott Abels.



Please find the rest here.

Friday, April 20, 2012

New Jacket2 post on TRANS writing by hastain/Tabios & jai arun ravine

New thresholds, new anatomies!


Lava on Hawai`i Island, 2010
j/j hastain begins "crepuscular," from the relational elations    of ORPHANED ALGEBRA, (with Eileen Tabios, and hereinafter referred to at treooa) with this simple problem: "The dilemma of belonging. What of that has to do with things exterior to us and what of it has to do with our own regard of exteriors and interiors?" (27)  hastain responds to Tabios's sequence of prose poems that engage orphanhood, in particular those orphans who are older, are considered too old to be adopted.  The orphan who becomes part of Tabios's family (provenance Columbia, destination California) is doing word problems in algebra.  But these problems are more complicated than the math would indicate.  Arriving at a reference to walls that "slant at 65-degree angles" the child thinks of "the man you longed to call "Dad."  He is not father, but "potential father."  What appears outside the "glass-less window" is "a lucid mountain."  The man has scarred the boy.  Their relation is not lucid.  Hence, the "answer" to the equation is "'indifference > hatred'?"  Equations do not generally end with question marks; this one offers a "resolution" in ambiguities.  Most of us consider indifference to be a thing better than hatred.  But an orphan, who needs feeling, an emotional relation, longs for it to be strong, not absent or ambiguous.  His regard meets the world's disregard in an equation whose answer is no answer.  As hastain writes in LUCIDITY DISCERNING: "The desire for a father is not a father" (30).

See the rest here

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Jacket2 commentary on Hazel Smith, Caroline Sinavaiana & diaspora


Uncertain geographies: Caroline Sinavaiana & Hazel Smith in (imagined) conversation

Part of the "Hand Upon Hand" sculpture in Centennial Park, Sydney; poem by Adam Aitken
In her marvelous, odd textbook, The Writing Experiment: Strategies for Innovative Creative Writing, Hazel Smith devotes a late chapter to “Mapping worlds, moving cities.”  Composing in a kind of sociological sublime, she writes in the subsection, “The diasporic city,” of the sub-section, “Cities rather than city,” “As the concept of the nation-state breaks down, people migrate and borders shift.  The modern western city has become a mixture of nationalities and ethnicities: this has transformed food, clothing, customs, art and language” (260).  Cutting to the chase, she ends her paragraph on “the diasporic city” with this pithy sentence: “The diasporic city is as much about displacement as about place” (261).   The neatly structured description of this city hardly masks the layers of discomfort and exuberance to which Smith refers, inviting students to write their own city-selves.   Two writers published by Tinfish Press, one of them Hazel Smith and the other Caroline Sinavaiana, explore that vein of dis-ease.  They have almost certainly never met, as their paths have covered different roads, followed different tides, but putting their work in conversation opens new possibilites for talking about poetries of diaspora.

You can find the full commentary here.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Poetry reading on Monday, April 9 at Revolution Books, Honolulu, 4:30-6 p.m.

Monday, April 9, 4:30-6pm
Poetry Readings by Hank Lazer and Susan Schultz
@ Revolution Books

Poetry with wine and cheese after a busy day at work? Join us for a special poetry reading on Monday (not Sunday) between 4:30-6PM. Our special out-of-town guest will be Hank Laser, who will be reading from his latest book of poetry, "N18." He will be joined by Susan Schultz, who will share pieces from her latest book of poetry, "Memory Cards."

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

"When was it that you stopped using the word 'home'?" Yang Lian in Auckland

My post-conference (Short Takes on Long Poems) commentary is up at Jacket2, about the Chinese poet, Yang Lian's writing about Auckland.



You can find it here.

Jack Ross, whom I met in Auckland, is also blogging for Jacket2 now, and he has a commentary on the conference here.

And he blogged on "the world's longest beach poem" here, an event that ended the symposium in a major key.